Testmiljö
Observera att detta är en testmiljö för utveckling som inte ska användas som underlag för klinisk bedömning. Besök Janusmed här: https://janusmed.se

11/21/2024

Janusmed kön och genus

Janusmed kön och genus – Ifosfamid

Janusmed kön och genus är ett kunskapsstöd som tillhandahåller information om köns- och genusaspekter på läkemedelsbehandling. Kunskapsstödet är avsedd främst för hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal. Texterna är generella och ska inte ses som behandlingsriktlinjer. Det är alltid behandlande läkare som ansvarar för patientens medicinering.

För att komma till startsidan för Janusmed kön och genus och för att göra sökningar klicka här.

Tillbaka till index
C! C!
C! C!

Ifosfamid Testmiljö

Ifosfamid

Klass : C!

Visa all info

Skriv ut

Kontakta oss

  1. Vera Regitz-Zagrosek. Sex and Gender Differences in Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.

  2. Freyer G, Tranchand B, Ligneau B, Ardiet C, Souquet PJ, Court-Fortune I et al. Population pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin, etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer patients: results of a multicentre study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(4):315-24.

  3. Bramwell VH, Mouridsen HT, Santoro A, Blackledge G, Somers R, Verwey J et al. Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide: final report of a randomized phase II trial in adult soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987;23(3):311-21.

  4. Fresneau B, Hackshaw A, Hawkins DS, Paulussen M, Anderson JR, Judson I et al. Investigating the heterogeneity of alkylating agents' efficacy and toxicity between sexes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide (MAIAGE study). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(8).

  5. Le Deley MC, Paulussen M, Lewis I, Brennan B, Ranft A, Whelan J et al. Cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in consolidation treatment of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma: results of the randomized noninferiority Euro-EWING99-R1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(23):2440-8.

  6. Paulussen M, Craft AW, Lewis I, Hackshaw A, Douglas C, Dunst J et al. Results of the EICESS-92 Study: two randomized trials of Ewing's sarcoma treatment--cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in standard-risk patients and assessment of benefit of etoposide added to standard treatment in high-risk patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(27):4385-93.

  7. Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, Fryer C, Raney RB, Ruymann FB et al. Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(12):3091-102.

  8. Ferrari S, Palmerini E, Staals E, Abate ME, Longhi A, Cesari M et al. Sex- and age-related chemotherapy toxicity in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma. J Chemother. 2009;21(2):205-10.

  9. Holoxan (ifosfamide). Swedish Medical Products Agency [updated 2018-09-26, cited 2022-02-25]

  10. Conise (INSIKT). Kalmar: eHälsomyndigheten. 2018 [cited 2021-11-18.]

  1. Vera Regitz-Zagrosek. Sex and Gender Differences in Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.
  2. Freyer G, Tranchand B, Ligneau B, Ardiet C, Souquet PJ, Court-Fortune I et al. Population pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin, etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer patients: results of a multicentre study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(4):315-24.
  3. Bramwell VH, Mouridsen HT, Santoro A, Blackledge G, Somers R, Verwey J et al. Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide: final report of a randomized phase II trial in adult soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987;23(3):311-21.
  4. Fresneau B, Hackshaw A, Hawkins DS, Paulussen M, Anderson JR, Judson I et al. Investigating the heterogeneity of alkylating agents' efficacy and toxicity between sexes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide (MAIAGE study). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(8).
  5. Le Deley MC, Paulussen M, Lewis I, Brennan B, Ranft A, Whelan J et al. Cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in consolidation treatment of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma: results of the randomized noninferiority Euro-EWING99-R1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(23):2440-8.
  6. Paulussen M, Craft AW, Lewis I, Hackshaw A, Douglas C, Dunst J et al. Results of the EICESS-92 Study: two randomized trials of Ewing's sarcoma treatment--cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in standard-risk patients and assessment of benefit of etoposide added to standard treatment in high-risk patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(27):4385-93.
  7. Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, Fryer C, Raney RB, Ruymann FB et al. Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(12):3091-102.
  8. Ferrari S, Palmerini E, Staals E, Abate ME, Longhi A, Cesari M et al. Sex- and age-related chemotherapy toxicity in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma. J Chemother. 2009;21(2):205-10.
  9. Holoxan (ifosfamide). Swedish Medical Products Agency [updated 2018-09-26, cited 2022-02-25]
  10. Conise (INSIKT). Kalmar: eHälsomyndigheten. 2018 [cited 2021-11-18.]